LJ's most recent fuckup has Internet up in arms. It doesn't affect me much, since I have comments disabled on LJ already. Nonetheless it's indicative of an attitude the LJ management have towards the users that's only been getting worse.
For reference, here are the rules:
- Comment as much as you like, link to comments, pingback, whatever you like. Particularly feel free to link to comments in places where Respected Newspaper Editors might see them and think that that nice young man might want a job.
- Do it with an access-restricted post and I will hunt you the fuck down. There will be fire.
I remember being the sole voice of reason during Nipplegate, but the situation has deteriorated since then. A lot of people seem to be resisting Dreamwidth on the basis that it's full of self-important whiners and fandoms. I'm not sure these people have looked at Livejournal recently, or indeed ever. Both sites have their fair share of thirteen-year-old slashers and Twitards. It's what internet is for.
Personally, I find that Dreamwidth is a nicer site, with a (much) nicer interface, and a richer featureset in terms of options that are actually useful. The colours are nicer (I turned off that pink shit). The staff are much nicer. So far, nobody there has tried to use free pictures of kittens to mollify an outraged userbase. They listen to their users in a way that LJ doesn't. And I'm not giving my money to the Russian Mafia.
Also: ew, Facebook.
In the vain hope that it will be useful, here's what I do to combine usage of the two sites:
- Use the automated import tool to scarf all of my original content from its previous LJ home.
- Automatically crosspost entries from DW to LJ.
- Deactivate comments on the crosspost, so I can keep the discussion in one place.
- LJ users can comment via LJ OpenID, or anonymously, or with another OpenID, however they wish.[0]
- Get on with my life, secure in the knowledge that stupid shit doesn't, currently, occur in this region of Internet.
- Use LJ solely to read those people who are still there.
Easy. It's not perfect, but it works. When they get cross-site reading sorted out, it will be even awesomer.
I should mention I have DW invite codes for them as wants them.
(no subject)
Date: Fri, Sep. 3rd, 2010 20:59 (UTC)Wouldn't it be simpler to just post to DreamWidth and let anyone who wants to, subscribe to the RSS feed so they can read it in Google Reader etc.? By having your posts appear on LJ aren't you making it less certain that people will ever migrate to DW?
As for DW what put me off it was being spammed every couple of days with news from the staff. I've unsubscribed from that feed but I've started thinking I might start using my Wordpress blog instead.
(no subject)
Date: Fri, Sep. 3rd, 2010 21:28 (UTC)Quite possibly. It's not up to me to dictate where people migrate. If you want to read me on LJ, you can. I think of myself as a content provider. Walled gardens are for China.
> what put me off it was being spammed every couple of days with news from the staff
You mean the weekly newspost? Doesn't bother me. Easily ignored. And when I do read it, I tend to find that it's full of actual good news rather than some fucker trying to sell me more GIFs.
(no subject)
Date: Sat, Sep. 4th, 2010 18:16 (UTC)While I agree in the case of LJ/DW, some people take that attitude too far. For example I don't think LinkedIn is the right place for most Tweets.
As for DW I've just found a nice theme that makes the reading page much like Wordpress, which turns in into something I'm much happier reading (and I can imagine reading long, "serious" posts in it!).
(no subject)
Date: Sat, Sep. 4th, 2010 19:11 (UTC)That's exactly the problem a lot of people are having with this sudden new LJ-fail. People have their real-life friends and acquaintances on the Facebook. Very few people want their boss and Great Auntie Mabel to know about the explicit Sylar/Spock hurt/comfort slashfic they just wrote.
But a blog is designed to be read, and preferably by as many people as possible: I don't mind how you read it or where you read it from, but I'm keeping the comments here.
(no subject)
Date: Fri, Sep. 3rd, 2010 22:09 (UTC)Greader doesn't support auth=digest thus won't show locked content.
Plus, a large number of LJ users won't do anything other than read their friends page, GReader is a whole other world.
Having posts on LJ makes it more likely people that aren't planning on leaving now will be reminded there's an option later.
(don't know what you mean in your latter comment, and this is a drive by comment, but dw_news updates weekly only, to my knowledge always has done)
(no subject)
Date: Fri, Sep. 3rd, 2010 22:57 (UTC)See, that's something I don't understand. To me, LJ/DW is less of a "serious" medium. If I want to write something that "Respected Newspapers" might pick up on, I'd write it on my proper website.
I obviously wasn't logging into DW very regularly then, but all I knew was that the posts from dw_news was swamping posts from people I know.
(no subject)
Date: Fri, Sep. 3rd, 2010 23:01 (UTC)I've been quoted in Teh Graun and The Indy, hell, the Indy used LJ as its main blogging platform for awhile, dumped because LJ sacked the staff responsible, and the new Indy owner doesn't get on with the LJ owner.
(no subject)
Date: Sat, Sep. 4th, 2010 14:06 (UTC)It's as serious as you, the author, let it be. You might as well say that paper isn't a serious medium because some people draw cocks on it.
(no subject)
Date: Sat, Sep. 4th, 2010 12:56 (UTC)I thought DW already had cross-site reading sorted out. Can you not read LJ posts from DW yet?
(no subject)
Date: Sat, Sep. 4th, 2010 13:05 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Sat, Sep. 4th, 2010 13:59 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: Sat, Sep. 4th, 2010 14:09 (UTC)There are always RSS feeds.
(no subject)
Date: Sat, Sep. 4th, 2010 20:41 (UTC)