Musings

Wed, Jun. 7th, 2006 00:14
gominokouhai: (Default)
[personal profile] gominokouhai
If redheads are going to die out by 2100, how do you explain Beverley Crusher?

~

The newspapers have been full of crap today about the date being 666. There was a double-page spread in the Scotsman about the cultural implications of a minor numerical coincidence. Nobody bothered to mention D-Day.

(no subject)

Date: Tue, Jun. 6th, 2006 23:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anjylle.livejournal.com
Genetic manipulation?

I noticed that spread (someone sitinng a bit ahead of me on the train had a copy). To which proclaimation I repeat my initial response: bollocks.

(no subject)

Date: Wed, Jun. 7th, 2006 02:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stormsearch.livejournal.com
Beverley Crusher can be explained by a male in charge recognising the importance of the redhead to male viewers, and thus insisting that a redhead was employed.

Other than that, as Beth said, gene manipulation. After all, we're heading down the route of designer babies.

(no subject)

Date: Wed, Jun. 7th, 2006 07:21 (UTC)

Style Credit

Base style:
regna
Theme:
[personal profile] rising
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios